Archeological Evidence & Facts

Unveiling the Truth: A Journey Through Historical and Biblical Evidence

In our quest for uncovering profound truths, this section offers compelling visual evidence that explores the intersection of faith, history, and belief. Through carefully selected documentaries and videos, we delve deep into the foundations of Christianity and examine key events and figures that have shaped spiritual discourse throughout the ages.

Our mission is to provide viewers with an immersive experience that not only informs but inspires reflection and deeper understanding. As you watch the first video in this series, The Passion of the Christ, followed by additional thought-provoking content, we invite you to contemplate the significance of these events and how they continue to resonate in today`s world.

Each piece of evidence presented here is part of a broader narrative aimed at unveiling the truth of historical and biblical events. Join us on this journey of discovery, where faith meets fact, and where each revelation brings us closer to a more enlightened perspective on the truths that define our existence.

Reliability of the Bible

Reliability of the Bible

We currently have 5,800 plus Greek New Testament manuscripts, 10,000 plus Latin manuscripts, and 9,300 plus manuscripts in various languages). If we were to stack the manuscripts we have found today it would reach more than a mile high). Beating all other historical records of the ancient world. for example, no one doubts the historical person “Homer” as we have 1.800 plus manuscripts of his life, yet we have 25,000 plus manuscripts of the life of Jesus, which doesn`t include secular sources). And considering that the earliest copies of the New Testament are written within 25 years after the death of Jesus, but the earliest copies of Homer's works are written 400 years after the death of Homer. Jesus is the gold standard for historians. If we`re going to doubt Jesus. We might as while doubt all ancient history.

Comparing these manuscripts, we find that the teachings, stories, and doctrines of the Bible are all surprisingly the same. Reading a Bible in English is different from reading a Bible in Russian. It may be worded differently, but you get the same story/biblical doctrine.

Though no one manuscript is perfect. Through the centuries, minor differences arose in the various copies of the Scriptures. The vast majority of these differences are simple spelling variants, and inverted words (one manuscript says “Christ Jesus” while another says “Jesus Christ” or different ways people have spelled names). or an easily identified missing word. In short, over 99 percent of the biblical text is not questioned. No doctrinal teaching or command is jeopardized of the less than 1 percent of the text in question. In other words, the copies of the Bible we have today are pure. The Bible has not been corrupted, altered, edited, revised, or tampered with.

“The early books of the bible” were so vastly copied and widespread that if one group in Africa wanted to change any part, believers in Israel, Rome, and Alexandria would have easily identified the change to the widespread text/message

This is also evidenced by the Dead Sea Scrolls (large portions of the Old Testament) which were found in 1947. These scrolls are dated 200 BC. So Jesus would have those as scripture during his earthly time, and the content of those scrolls match. If we look at any bible in any chapter and we look at the Hebrew and the same chapter it`s going to read the same way we have today, now it is true there are variations in reading/wording or translation. Every book before the printing press has variations. The Quran has variations, The point is, that variations don`t give you a different text, a different theology, or a different meaning.

Here`s a scaled-down example. using textual criticism and cross-checking manuscripts. We can pretty much reconstruct what the original said. How does this work? Consider the following example. Suppose we have four different manuscripts that have different errors in the same verse, such as Philippians 4:13:

  • I can do all t#ings through Christ
  • I can do all th#ngs through Christ
  • I can do all thi#gs through Christ
  • I can do all thin#s through Christ

Is there any mystery of what the original said? None whatsoever. By comparing and cross-checking manuscripts. the original can be reconstructed with great accuracy. and the reconstruction of the New Testament is easier than this because there are far fewer errors in the actual New Testament manuscripts than there are represented by this example. Plus a vast amount of material to work with.

Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document.

There is no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. No one group has ever had control over the biblical text. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God`s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.

Ancient scribes often copied books letter by letter (one by one) not sentence by sentence. It was a long process but they assured accuracy and they would count the letters of the copies and count the letters of the original. if the original had 500 letters and the copy had 497 letters, they would destroy the copy and restart.

The Importance of Biblical Archaeology

Archeology Image

Archaeology Is a Matter of Matter

Archaeology thus provides us with the material cultural context of antiquity. It demonstrates how ancient people lived: how they cultivated their crops, constructed their buildings, buried their dead, managed their water resources, and handled other aspects of their physical existence. Archaeology is, quite literally, groundbreaking work.

Archaeology Is a Matter of History

In an age that often seeks to debunk history and the events portrayed in the Bible, skepticism persists about practices such as widespread child sacrifice in the ancient world. While Scripture depicts such practices, many doubt their historical accuracy. However, archaeological discoveries in ancient Carthage have provided evidence suggesting the occurrence of child sacrifice. These findings support the reality that biblical events did occur in history.

Biblical events genuinely unfolded in space and time. As Paul argues in 1 Corinthians 15, if the historical resurrection of Jesus Christ did not happen, then “your faith is in vain” and “your faith is futile” (1 Corinthians 15:14). If the dead are not resurrected in space and time, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die” (1 Corinthians 15:32). Therefore, history is essential to the Christian faith.

Archaeology Is a Matter of Interest

Excavation work piques the interest of Christians by bringing the past to light. Archaeologists unearth artifacts that have remained hidden for thousands of years. This hands-on, or "dirty hands," approach underscores the tangible reality of biblical events and settings. In this way, archaeology helps make the Bible come to life.

1 / 3

Explore Biblical Truths: Highlights from Biblical Creation

1 / 3

Explore the Works of Trey Smith

Trey Smith is a renowned creator of thought-provoking documentaries that explore biblical history, creationism, and archaeology.

His work delves into the mysteries of ancient times and offers captivating insights into topics that connect science and faith.

1 / 3

Explore the Insights of Answers in Genesis

Answers in Genesis is a apologetics ministry dedicated in providing biblical answers to life's most important questions.

By exploring the foundational truths of scripture and the scientific evidence for creation, this ministry equips Christians to stand firm in their faith.

Through educational resources and powerful insights, Answers in Genesis addresses critical topics such as creation, evolution, and the reliability of the Bible.

1 / 2

Explore the Insights of Expedition Bible

Expedition Bible brings you the teaching of Joel Kramer, a biblical archaeologist and former expeditioner in his younger years.

Watch, learn, and be encouraged as Joel lays out the evidence for the historicity, authenticity, and authority of the Word of God.

1 / 2

Genesis Apologetics

Come and see the most photo-realistic and Biblically accurate film about Noah’s Flood ever produced!

Geology, paleontology, the fossil record, ancient history, volcanism, earth science—all of these scientific fields converge on one simple truth: Noah’s Flood actually happened

25 REASONS TO DOUBT THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION

It is an established scientific fact that life cannot originate from non-living matter (the Law of Biogenesis).

The chemical evolution of life is impossible. No scientist has ever advanced a testable procedure by which this could occur. The Miller-Urey experiment, still shown in many current textbooks, has been proven to be irrelevant.

Mendel`s Laws of Genetics limit the variations in a species. Different combinations of genes are formed, but not different genes. Breeding experiments and common observations have also confirmed that genetic boundaries exist.

Acquired characteristics cannot be inherited. For example, the long necks of giraffes did not result from their ancestors stretching their necks to reach high leaves, nor does a man in a weight-lifting program pass his well-developed muscles on to his child. No mechanism exists whereby the altered behavior of an organism, in an attempt to adapt to its environment, will produce a genetic change in its offspring.

Genetic mutations have never made a creature more viable than its ancestors. Mutations are almost always harmful, and many are lethal. More than 90 years of fruit fly experiments, involving 3,000 successive generations, give absolutely no basis for believing that any natural or artificial process can cause an increase in complexity and viability. “A mutation is a random change of a highly organized, reasonably smoothly functioning living body. A random change in the highly integrated system of chemical processes which constitute life is almost certain to impair it – just as the random interchange of connections in a television set is not likely to improve the picture.” James F. Crow ( past Professor of Genetics, University of Wisconsin)

Natural selection (or “survival of the fittest”) actually prevents evolutionary change, it does not encourage it. Since mutations almost always contribute to a decrease in viability (survivability), the mutated animal quickly becomes part of the food chain.

Mutations cannot produce complex organs such as the eye, the ear, or the brain, much less the intricacy of design found in microbiological organisms. These organs are not even imaginable, much less viable in a partially developed state. The principle of “irreducible complexity” demonstrates that a wide range of component parts and technologies must be simultaneously existent for these organs to function. In a partially developed state, they would become a liability to an organism, not an advantage. Moreover, most complex organs have interdependent relationships with other complex organs which enable proper functioning. These relationships must also be simultaneously existent.

The most complex phenomena known to science are found in living systems. Detailed studies of various animals have also revealed physical equipment and capabilities that cannot even be copied by the world`s best designers using the most sophisticated technologies. Examples include the miniature and reliable sonar systems of dolphins, porpoises and whales; the frequency-modulated radar and discrimination system of bats; the aerodynamic capabilities and efficiency of the hummingbird; the control systems, internal ballistics and combustion chamber of the bombardier beetle; the precise and redundant navigational system of the arctic tern; and the self-repair capabilities of practically all forms of life. All evidence points to “intelligent design,” not random processes.

All living species are fully developed, and their organs are fully developed. There are no living lizards with scale-feathers, leg-wings, or 3-chambered hearts. If evolutionary processes were the norm, these intermediate forms of development should be observable throughout nature. Instead, they are non-existent.

All living creatures are divided into distinct types. There should be a myriad of transitional, un-classifiable creatures if evolution was the norm. There is no direct evidence that any major group of animals or plants arose from any other major group.

Created kind are only observed going into extinction, never coming into existence.

The fossil record contains no transitional forms of animals, only extinct forms. The fossil record has been studied so thoroughly that it is safe to conclude that the alleged “gaps” or “missing links” will never be found.

The so-called “evolutionary tree” has no trunk. In the earliest part of the fossil record (generally the Cambrian sedimentary layer), life appears suddenly, complex, diversified and fully developed.

Insects have no known evolutionary ancestors.

Many different forms of life are completely dependent upon each other (symbiotic relationships). Even members of the honeybee family, consisting of the queen, workers, and drones, are interdependent. If one member of each interdependent group evolved first, it could not have survived. Since all members of these groups have survived, they must have come into existence simultaneously. The only possible answer for their existence is “intelligent design”.

It is impossible to conceive of an evolutionary process that results in sexual reproduction. Complementary male and female systems must have completely and independently evolved at each stage at the exact same time and place. The millions of mechanical and chemical processes, as well as behavioral patterns and physical characteristics, would all need to be compatible. Even leading evolutionists admit they cannot explain this.

Human speech and languages did not evolve – in fact the best evidence is that languages “devolve”. Speech is uniquely human. Furthermore, studies of 36 documented cases of children raised without human contact show that speech appears to be learned only from other humans. Apparently, humans do not automatically speak. If so, the first humans must have been endowed with a speaking ability (intelligent input). There is no evidence that speech has evolved.

Codes and programs (DNA and the genetic code) are produced only by intelligence. No natural process has ever been observed to produce a program.

The existence of similarities between different forms of life implies a common designer, not a common ancestor. One would not, for example, assume that a submarine evolved into an “amphibious” seaplane, which in turn evolved into a passenger airliner. All might have common features such as propellers, internal combustion engines, and metal frameworks – but this is simply an indication of a common intelligent designer (man), not a common ancestor (the submarine).

Many single-celled forms of life exist, but there are no known forms of animal life with 2, 3, 4 or 5 cells, and the forms of life with 6 to 20 cells are parasites. If evolution occurred, one should find many forms of life with 2 to 20 cells as transitional forms between one-celled and many-celled organisms.

As an embryo develops, it does not repeat an evolutionary sequence. Although it is widely known that Ernst Haeckel, who popularized this belief, deliberately falsified his drawings, they are still used in current biology textbooks.

No verified form of extraterrestrial life of any kind has ever been observed. If life evolved on Earth, one would expect that at least simple forms of life, such as microbes, would have been found by the elaborate experiments sent to the moon and Mars.

Ape-men never existed. It is now acknowledged that “Piltdown man” was a hoax; the only evidence for “Nebraska man” turned out to be a pig`s tooth; Eugene Bubois conceded forty years after he discovered “Java man” that it was just a large gibbon; the skulls of “Peking man” are now considered by many to be the remains of apes; the classification Homo erectus is considered by most experts to be a category that should never have been created.

The earth`s sedimentary layers were deposited rapidly, not slowly over millions of years. There is no evidence of erosion between layers. The existence of fossils dictates a sudden deposition of sediments. “Polystrate” fossils (those that span multiple strata) can only be explained by rapid burial in multiple sedimentary layers that were liquefied or soft at the time. The “millions of years” assigned to the geological strata and the evolutionary tree is based entirely on unfounded assumptions.

Radioactive dating methods are based on a number of untestable assumptions that produce “old age” results. Past atmospheric conditions, solar activity, volcanic activity, state of the earth`s magnetic field, decay rates of radioactive elements, and other factors are simply unknown. Most dating techniques actually indicate that the earth is “young”, not “old”.

1 / 25